Friday, October 14, 2011
Ranee at Arabian Knits wrote:
> Regardless, I do wonder about your initial implication and later statement that property is theft. Does that mean that you eschew all property? Or are you an unrepentant thief? Or, like so many with this ideological stance, do you view yourself as being more worthy of such possessions than the average man?
>
Mea culpa! Maxi Mea Culpa!
Woman is the Nigger of the World, we are all prostitutes, slaves and bozos on this bus, a bunch of gullible heard animals and property (especially private) property is theft.
I am a flawed, imperfect being caught in an inescapable trap not of my own making, in that i own property then yes, i am a thief, but NOT "unrepentant".
I like to believe that the earth, the means of production and labour cannot and should not be owned by individuals and to do so should be a crime. Labour precedes and creates capital.
Here i must paraphrase a poet who, imo, puts the proposition more succinctly than i....
There shall be no Property in Human Thought. Let each think as he will concerning the
Universe; but let none seek to impose that Thought upon another by any Threat of Penalty in this
World or any other World.
There shall be no Property in Human Flesh.
Every Man and every Woman hath Right
Indefeasable to give the Body for the Enjoyment of any other.
The Exercise of this Right shall
not be punished either by Law or by Custom; there shall be no Penalty either by Loss or
Curtailment of Liberty, of Rights, of Wealth, or of Social Esteem; but this Freedom shall be
respected of all, seeing that it is the Right of the Bodily Will.
******
For this same Reason thou shalt
cause full Restriction and Punishment of any who may seek to limit that Freedom for the sake of
his own Profit, or Desire, or Ideal.
*****
Every Man and every Woman has full right either to grant or
to deny the Body, as the Will speaketh within.
This being made Custom, the Evils of Love,
which are many, extending to the Disturbance not only of Body but of Mind, and that in obscure
Paths, shall little by little disappear from the Face of The unspeakable Glory.
--
JL
> Regardless, I do wonder about your initial implication and later statement that property is theft. Does that mean that you eschew all property? Or are you an unrepentant thief? Or, like so many with this ideological stance, do you view yourself as being more worthy of such possessions than the average man?
>
Mea culpa! Maxi Mea Culpa!
Woman is the Nigger of the World, we are all prostitutes, slaves and bozos on this bus, a bunch of gullible heard animals and property (especially private) property is theft.
I am a flawed, imperfect being caught in an inescapable trap not of my own making, in that i own property then yes, i am a thief, but NOT "unrepentant".
I like to believe that the earth, the means of production and labour cannot and should not be owned by individuals and to do so should be a crime. Labour precedes and creates capital.
Here i must paraphrase a poet who, imo, puts the proposition more succinctly than i....
There shall be no Property in Human Thought. Let each think as he will concerning the
Universe; but let none seek to impose that Thought upon another by any Threat of Penalty in this
World or any other World.
There shall be no Property in Human Flesh.
Every Man and every Woman hath Right
Indefeasable to give the Body for the Enjoyment of any other.
The Exercise of this Right shall
not be punished either by Law or by Custom; there shall be no Penalty either by Loss or
Curtailment of Liberty, of Rights, of Wealth, or of Social Esteem; but this Freedom shall be
respected of all, seeing that it is the Right of the Bodily Will.
******
For this same Reason thou shalt
cause full Restriction and Punishment of any who may seek to limit that Freedom for the sake of
his own Profit, or Desire, or Ideal.
*****
Every Man and every Woman has full right either to grant or
to deny the Body, as the Will speaketh within.
This being made Custom, the Evils of Love,
which are many, extending to the Disturbance not only of Body but of Mind, and that in obscure
Paths, shall little by little disappear from the Face of The unspeakable Glory.
--
JL
Monday, August 1, 2011
>Sun Jul 31, 2011 at 07:15 PM PDT
>
>POTUS Has Our Back
>by airforceblue
>
> What they also got is a damocles hanging over their head in the form of the soon to expire Bush tax cuts, which Obama can blackmail them with just as they did all of us with the debt ceiling.
>
>
Shouldn't that be "a sword of Damocles"?
Or do they plan to start lynching the republicans?
When you casually mug the rich you usually only get spare change.
To make them cough up more of their ill got gains (sell off at least one
private jet and limit oneself to only half a dozen polo ponies) you got
to seriously threaten their rights and privileges (legal & social) to
exercise the ability to be rich & powerfull (confiscatory taxes, government
regulatory agencies, private property, control of the means of
production) before they will try to bribe you off with a
larger share of their ill-gotten gains.
Which, by then its probly to late anyway and hopefully, carrying that
picture of Chairman Mao wont be so meaningless any how:)
--
JL
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Janet wrote:
>
>it only stands to reason that i would interpret your remarks as more indicative of your >abilities to formulate, much less express your personal bias's as any exceptional quality to >them:)
>
>
>
> Your premise makes no grammatical sense, and even worse, it contains a misuse of the apostrophe.
>
> Janet
>
>
The horror! the horror!
"The themes explored by Burgess in The Wanting Seed seem all-too-relevant at the dawn of this twenty-first century, as land and resources dwindle and the Earth’s population continues to rise steadily, with the world’s most powerful empires engaged in an undeclared, undefined war on an Enemy whose name is simply ‘Terror’. Is it possible that even now, the masses are being manipulated into support for a pragmatic, never-ending war necessary to sustain a quality of life that seems otherwise unsustainable? Perhaps, as Burgess suggests, the masses won’t have it any other way. Perhaps human existence, for most, really is little more than sex and death—one forever demanding the other."
--
JL
>
>it only stands to reason that i would interpret your remarks as more indicative of your >abilities to formulate, much less express your personal bias's as any exceptional quality to >them:)
>
>
>
> Your premise makes no grammatical sense, and even worse, it contains a misuse of the apostrophe.
>
> Janet
>
>
The horror! the horror!
"The themes explored by Burgess in The Wanting Seed seem all-too-relevant at the dawn of this twenty-first century, as land and resources dwindle and the Earth’s population continues to rise steadily, with the world’s most powerful empires engaged in an undeclared, undefined war on an Enemy whose name is simply ‘Terror’. Is it possible that even now, the masses are being manipulated into support for a pragmatic, never-ending war necessary to sustain a quality of life that seems otherwise unsustainable? Perhaps, as Burgess suggests, the masses won’t have it any other way. Perhaps human existence, for most, really is little more than sex and death—one forever demanding the other."
--
JL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
